February 13, 2006
TO ACCOMPANY the editorial in the new issue of THE WEEKLY STANDARD, we have reproduced the page with the Mohammed cartoons from the September 30 Jyllands-Posten. Readers should be able to see what this controversy is about. More important, in light of recent instances of capitulation to the threats of radical Islamists, and in response to eloquent pleas by individuals like Walid-al-Kubaisi in Norway to publish the cartoons in order to protect freedom of expression, we wanted to do our small part to stand against intimidation by extremists.Will this be enough to shame the quivering quislings in America's mainstream media into doing their jobs? That remains to be seen. more...
--William Kristol
Posted by: Bluto at
12:12 AM
| Comments (15)
| Add Comment
Post contains 152 words, total size 1 kb.
February 12, 2006
Just what is the kindler, gentler party saying about this?
"Guns don't kill people...
...maniacal, ignorant, national-security-breaching, draft deferring cowards do."Posted by: ErikG
I find it interesting that in the "read more" links at HuffPo the term Dick Cheney is immediately followed by Halliburton. Let's find another jewel from the left:
Incompetency at every level in this Administration!Posted by: JudyDownMaine
She's welcome to her opinion but this might be taking it too far:
Leave it to Dickless Cheney to fuck up a hunting trip.Just add it to the long, long list of things Bushpigs aren't competent to handle.
Posted by: MoeLarryAndJesus
MoeLarryAndJesus? That alone should let you know what the left things about Christians. But here's one from someone who apparently has some sanity left:
This is a very unfortunate accident for the man who was shot as well as Vice President Cheney. It will be even more unfortunate if Democrats latch onto this issue to attack the Vice President when there are many more legitimate issues to hold against him right now.Posted by: SkepticalDemocrat
Speaking of true colors:
Dick Cheney is an evil fucking scumbag who desrves to be.....................something.Posted by: blather
The list goes on and on. At the time of this writing there were 590 comments and I saved them all in a folder on my desktop aptly named "Ammo". Why "Ammo"? Well... This certainly isn't the first time I've witnessed the loony-bin of the left spit venom and I wouldn't want the left to attempt to re-write history.
I agree with Michelle Malkin that this will generate some fodder for the late night talk show hosts. But, the comments quoted here are just flat out over the line.
The last time I reported about abusive comments on HuffPo the comments were pulled and Arianna Huffington sent her minions packing. We'll see if she has the moral fortitude to do the same thing twice. But, chances are she'll flip flop on this issue.
Technorati Tags: Dick Cheney, Harry Whittington, liberal, Arianna Huffington, Huffington Post, Unhinged
Posted by: Chris Short at
09:25 PM
| Comments (44)
| Add Comment
Post contains 435 words, total size 4 kb.
They're going to get their computer guys on it and talk to me tomorrow.
It could be nothing, it could be something, either way, someone overseas is going to be hauled in for interrogation.
I hope so, anyway.
Posted by: Vinnie at
05:51 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 64 words, total size 1 kb.
There's no confirmation of the rumor that Whittington is a Democrat.
Posted by: Mike Pechar at
03:22 PM
| Comments (18)
| Add Comment
Post contains 49 words, total size 1 kb.
From Reuters.com:
Saddam Hussein and the seven co-defendants in his trial are to start a hunger strike on Monday, the former Iraqi president's defense team said on Sunday, citing sources inside the detention center where they are being held.Frankly, the idea of strapping the murdering thug to a gurney and shoving a feeding tube through his nose and down his esophagus doesn't elicit my sympathy. In fact, I'd recommend that the authorities be innovative in force-feeding Saddam and try a new technique. A gnarly tube through the brokeback might work."Saddam and his followers will start a hunger strike from tomorrow, protesting the illegitimate procedures and bad treatment by the court," Khamis al-Aubeidi, a leading member of Saddam's defense team, told Reuters.
Nevertheless, the hunger strike is nicely timed to coincide with continuation of the trial which was interrupted two weeks ago when the defense team walked out of the courtroom and protested the new judge. Since then, Saddam has whined about being abused by prison guards. It appears that Saddam and his co-defendents are trying to do everything possible to disrupt the trial "to fuel concerns about the legitimacy of the tribunal and its eventual verdict."
From Interested-Participant.
Posted by: Mike Pechar at
12:52 PM
| Comments (14)
| Add Comment
Post contains 220 words, total size 2 kb.
Weekly Standard : Robert Frost said of liberals that they're incapable of taking their own side in a fight. We will see how deeply a degenerate form of liberalism has penetrated our souls. Will we anguish? Or will we fight?You could even Email FNS@foxnews.com for the across the board support from even the liberal NPR panelists. I now return me to my irregularly scheduled absence.
Posted by: Howie at
11:58 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 79 words, total size 1 kb.
Just how close was the relationship between the White House and disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff?Feel the tension? This is gonna be good. Maybe they caught Abramoff and the Prez in one of those unseemly man-hugs. Zagorin and Cooper continue to build the tension for their dramatic revelation:
Now, finally, the first such photo has come to light.Wow! This should be juicy. I can hardly wait. And here...it...is...TA-DA. more...
Posted by: Bluto at
11:30 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 174 words, total size 2 kb.
we are looking to atack on washington usa are u ready for this and bush we are looking to ur wife
Here is the IP address:
193.251.135.125
Email vinceautmorire@gmail.com for more info.
This is a direct threat upon the President of the United States. It had not better be taken lightly.
***Sticky, scroll down for new content***
Update: No longer a sticky post.
Thanks, kids, for running down that IP address. He left a couple more:
ready usa now the times come to destroy u
ugikufajfslkfjapirfjalsdkmcv sadc nvaijosfd naafihosidhvlkdnv lxkc noiazshdvoisfd vvihdzfv njzkx boizudfhv \azibvhoia\dz bjhpidzvjapoi\uvoafhd bdozlxighaofidbvh zdjfnvzuodshgvaodihv
My guess is that he's just some dork with internet access, but I'll take the advice of Thomas Paladino in the comments and submit this to the Effa Bee Eye.
I went ahead and contacted the local Secret Service office.
Posted by: Vinnie at
03:39 AM
| Comments (23)
| Add Comment
Post contains 151 words, total size 1 kb.

Also posted at The Dread Pundit Bluto and Vince Aut Morire.
Posted by: Bluto at
12:05 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 20 words, total size 1 kb.
February 11, 2006

That photo is for the caption contest, but the below photo is for extra credit. After your caption, tell us what is uglier, the dead bird, or the pasty-ass fish-belly lardo looking at it. Heh, guess you know my answer.

Posted by: Vinnie at
10:44 PM
| Comments (18)
| Add Comment
Post contains 64 words, total size 1 kb.
Rusty has finally, after centuries of begging, allowed me to post here.
He saw how popular the post below was and finally relented.
Feel free to caricature me all you wish, I'll just sent my faithful (PBUT) to behead you. After they torch your embassies first!
Posted by: Vinnie at
10:25 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 51 words, total size 1 kb.
Instead of all of us being Danish, let's just all be Mohammed.
There are many advantages to living this way.
The Danes and everyone else are on the defensive concerning this issue. By being Mohammed yourself, you get to go on the offensive. And the best defense is a quick offense.
If you are Mohammed, and someone takes your picture, you may behead them. Especially if it's that obnoxious relative you prayed wouldn't show up at the family reunion.
You get to breeze through security at most major airports.
You get to rape, pillage, and burn at the most minimal slight of your name.
Everyone will add PBUH after they refer to you.
So, from this point on, anyone who comments on my posts without the name Mohammed, or one of its derivates, will be summarily deleted.*
Of course I, don't have to change my blog name to Mohammed. I am granted free license to be a hypocrite.
Because we are all Mohammed now.
Note: leave your proper email and URL in your comment. You just have to change your name to Mohammed. Mustafa and PBUH are also accepted. So are Pedophile Prophet, Pedophile Pimp Prophet, and actus. more...
Posted by: Vinnie at
06:21 PM
| Comments (13)
| Add Comment
Post contains 222 words, total size 1 kb.
One can readily assume how this will be ruled; we are talking about the 9th Circuit here. The ACLU want to force the BSA to welcome professing homosexuals and even to recruit gay Scout leaders. They’d also like to erase the mention of “duty to God”. The ACLU is waging more than just a battle; it is waging a campaign. Since 1981, it has participated in at least 14 cases against the Boy Scouts.Indeed, the Ninth Circus Court of Fools is notorious for softheaded rulings that bear little resemblance to mainstream jurisprudence. This is the court that wanted to strike the words, "under God" from the Pledge of Allegiance.
The ACLU's past championing of the child molestation advocacy group, the North American Man-Boy Love Association (NAMBLA), makes their continued fascination with the BSA, and inserting homosexuals into its leadership, appear all the more sinister.
Also posted at The Dread Pundit Bluto and Vince Aut Morire.
Posted by: Bluto at
01:16 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 198 words, total size 1 kb.
In reality, major decisions are often made based upon incomplete information. When such a situation arises, one must think of the consequences of being wrong and the probabilities involved in worst case scenarios.
For instance, pick a single car about to enter the U.S. from Canada. The probability that this particular car is carrying a suitcase nuclear bomb is very, very low. Further, one cannot know what is in the trunk of this particular car.
You have two options: wave the car through without checking the trunk or stop the car and check to see what is inside. What is the proper course of action?
The proper course of action depends entirely on the consequences of being wrong. If you stop the car, and find that there is nothing in the trunk, you have inconvenienced the driver. Further, since you must repeat this action several thousand times a day, there is also the cost of hiring additional border agents. If you never find a bomb then you have wasted precious resources that could have been used in other places.
Imagine, though, that you don't stop the car and it does have a nuclear bomb in it. Oops.
The nature of estimating threats is that it is always based on incomplete information. We didn't know just how poor the Soviet military arsenal was during the Cold War. We didn't know that nuclear weapons were already on the island of Cuba during the missile crisis. Today, we don't know if Iran really intends to build a nuclear weapon. We don't know the extent to which al Qaeda has been destroyed. Yet, we did, and must continue to base policy decisions on incomplete information anyway.
Professor Chaos (also posted at OTB) has an excellent post that is a must read on ex-CIA official Paul R. Pillar's argument that the Adminstration was aware of uncertainties in the pre-Iraq war intelligence. First, he notes that the CIA is a bureaucracy, so that the President only sees what is presented to him by the top eschelon--namely the Clinton appointee George Tenet. Then:
Pillar suggests, as have countless others, is that there was ample evidence refuting the WMD intel but the Bush administration "cherry picked" that which pointed in the direction to war. There seems to be some truth to the notion that the administration listened more closely to intel that suggested a threat, but we can't ignore that this occurred in the aftermath of September 11 -- when the intelligence community (Pillar included) had ample information but failed to "connect the dots."Also, it begs the question of action. Even if the Administration knew the intelligence was incomplete, so what? A decision, one way or another, had to be made. One cannot wait until a perfectly clear picture becomes available--because one never does. Waiting for perfect intelligence is a recipe for disaster because perfect intelligence is never available. To believe that it can be is naive.In this light, the "rush" to go to war in Iraq was less a case of selectively using unreliable intel as it was the result of erring on the side of national security. Pillar may see that differently because he was a CIA insider, but his analysis here fails to recognize this broader national security lens through which the administration would have based its decisions.
Posted by: Rusty at
01:09 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 614 words, total size 4 kb.
This is the story of Hafez al-Bokari and Rahma Hujira, two leaders of Yemeni civil society who have struggled for years for journalists rights. In May of 2005, one of the regime stooge attack papers, Al-Belad, published a horrible article about them, which the Yemen Times at the time described as insulting to RehmaÂ’s honor. From all reports it was a very derogatory and crude article, but the Yemeni regime specializes in sleeze as well as brutality. Of course, the public prosecutor to date has not responded to their law suit against al-Belad filed in May.
In December, the following appeared on the internet site of al-Shawa newspaper: The manager of the office of the Saudi Okaz newspaper in Sana'a Hafez al-Bukari was dismissed from his job, reasons are vague. While al-Bukari refused to comment on the dismiss, some media reports though it based upon pressures on and calls to the Okaz headquarters in Saudi by Yemeni informants who do not agree with al-Bukari activities and defending stances for the sake of press freedom after he had been elected a secretary-general of the Yemeni Journalists Syndicate in 2004.
Now the paper of the Yemeni military, the 26 September, at the height of public emotion over the cartoons, published a front page article that Hafez and Rahma are agents of the Dutch government. (Hafez as the head of the syndicate was coordinating some journalistsÂ’ training program that set up by the Dutch and Yemeni governments. )
Yemen Times The board also condemned the accusation that was brought on the 26 September newspaper website. Here, Al-Bokari and his wife, journalist Rahma Hujaira, are said to have connections with Denmark. The syndicate considered this as a way to blackmail the two journalists, especially after the recent crises regarding the illustrations of the prophet Mohammad in the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten.
They attempted to bring a legal suit against the militaryÂ’s newspaper for publishing false and inflammatory information. From their letter to the Public Prosecutor in Yemen:
This article was published on the first news page on February 1st 2006. It included direct and clear instigation and offense against me Hafez Al-Bukari , President of Yemen Polling Center and General Secretary of Yemen Journalists Syndicate, and against my wife Rahma Hujira, Chairwoman of the Yemen Female Media Forum. You will also notice that this article includes false information that was made up intentionally for the purpose of being used unfairly against usÂ….Therefore, we would like to bring a legal suit against those responsible for the website and to draw you attention to the risks that may endanger not only our lives but also our children, families, the institutions we work for and the employees working in them. The reason for this is that this instigation published by this official military institution which is supposed to protect us as citizens of this country.
Such fake information proves that this article is an attempt to use the anger spread in the Muslim world to attack us individually and to attack our institutions; Yemen Polling Center and Yemen Female Media Forum for that these institutions are concerned with democratic, social, and media reformation and development and they tackle general issues related to the society.
No response from the Prosecutor yet. This incident is a clear example of the Yemeni government is using the cartoon controversy to target reformers. And it shows the true anti-democratic, anti-reform face of the Yemeni government.
More importantly, I hope it shows what IÂ’ve been saying for the last year(s): there are some real heroes in Yemen, fighting against enormous challenges, to bring about a more just society. Its not just al-Khaiwani, not just Rahma and Hafez, thereÂ’s many. The government targets them over and over in a variety of ways. They donÂ’t give up. ThereÂ’s some corrupt people, hungry people, and frightened people who bend to the will of the regime. The ones who put their country before themselves deserve our full support.
Posted by: JaneNovak at
12:54 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 719 words, total size 5 kb.
And via Headmistress SondraK this link to what seems to be the Islamic equivalent of Pentacostalism--only set to techno music so it's funny.
Posted by: Rusty at
12:03 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 84 words, total size 1 kb.
Apparently, the rumors started during the filming of the movie Bandidas. Unlike Brokeback Mountain, the film is the kind of gay cowboy film men will be flocking to see. No word on the amount of pudding consumed in the film. more...
Posted by: Rusty at
11:44 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 233 words, total size 2 kb.
"I was at a party the other night and it was all these hardcore Republicans and these guys are like, 'Why do you hate your country?' I said, 'I love my country.' They said, 'Why, at a time of war, would you criticise it then?' And I said, 'My country right or wrong means women don't vote, black people sit in the back of buses and we're still in Vietnam. My country right or wrong means we don't have the New Deal.' I mean, what, are you crazy? My country, right or wrong? It's not your right, it's your duty. And then I said, 'Where was I wrong, schmuck?' In 2003 I was saying, where are the ties [between Iraq] and al-Qaida? Where are the ties to 9/11? I knew it; where the fuck were these Democrats who said, 'We were misled'? That's the kind of thing that drives me crazy: 'We were misled.' Fuck you, you weren't misled. You were afraid of being called unpatriotic."Like, really? Like, you didn't kind of imagine this conversation in your head, did you, George? Like maybe you could name the "hardcore Republicans" so we could hear their side of the story?
But, like anyway, George, it reminds of something that happened to me the other day. Like, this hardcore liberal was, like, talking shit about America, you know, and he said, "George Bush is the biggest terrorist in the world!" And I was like, "Sir, your hypothesis is absurd. The basis of modern terrorism is the use of vicious, wanton attacks on innocent people in order to elicit fear on the populace for the purpose of coercing them into putting pressure on their leaders to make concessions that the terrorist deems desirable." And, shit, man, the hardore liberal is like, "Uh...", and then I'm like, "And obvously, George Bush, as the twice-elected President of the United States of America has not only the right, but the Constitutional duty, sir, to take whatever action he deems necessary to effect the safety and well-being of the country and her citizens, including appropriate military actions." And the lib dude is like, "But, but...", and then he had a stroke and died right on the spot! It was like karma, man, karma.
Now, none of this is to say that George Clooney is a lying sack of shit, and don't you ever question his patriotism.
Also posted at The Dread Pundit Bluto and Vince Aut Morire.
Posted by: Bluto at
12:01 AM
| Comments (21)
| Add Comment
Post contains 444 words, total size 3 kb.
February 10, 2006
Posted by: Vinnie at
06:17 PM
| Comments (14)
| Add Comment
Post contains 17 words, total size 1 kb.
A note accompanied the video released of Jill Carroll yesterday. I guess we now know what was on the note. Apparently, there is also a ransom demand.
Posted by: Rusty at
04:47 PM
| Comments (17)
| Add Comment
Post contains 316 words, total size 2 kb.
136 queries taking 0.284 seconds, 526 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








